beat wrote:
nnwltrs,
Thanks for sharing this clean and well-thought implementation idea, which indeed allows to do the best focussed marketing, tailored to each group of people, and is really easy to implement.
I am not sure why you think this. It has not been tested. He even said himself that he has not tried it. They have only done this with a calendar. Huge difference.
Have you done it this way?
beat wrote:
I believe Bubba HoTep hasn't seen yet the size and scope of CB

and definitely underestimates the work and all issues araising from his favorite approach if he thinks making a second instance of CB is easier than your excellent and so easy to implement and wise, straightforward, modern marketing-oriented solution.
Geez dude...
Anyways. I am only trying to figure out a solution for my particular situation. I am not sure what words such as wise, straightforward, and modern marketing-oriented have anything to do with whether a particular set up will work for a particular situation, when no one has even tried it.
beat wrote:
Existing CB extensions like GroupJive (looks like news are scheduled soon

), APC (momentarly not available, but hopefully available soon again

), and the CB subscriptions plugin (currently in last private beta tests by over a dozen beta-testers, one of them running a very popular wedding site among many other sites

) will also help bringing a cool solution. Not to speak about the pipeline of features CB 1.3 and 2.0 are preparing...
Groupjive does not do what I am wanting. It's main purpose is for creating groups. Which I do not need. Nothing else seems available. The subscription plugin may work, but it would not actually present any solutions for having two separate member types with 2 separate needs. If all I was doing was running a wedding site then this would be very easy and straight forward, but for my particular needs there has not been any solution presented that really makes sense. Are any of the upcoming releases going to address the request by others for a duplicated member type?
beat wrote:
Well, back to work to finish polishing the stable release and help getting out all those exciting things above
(btw nnwltrs and all doc subscribers:

thanks a lot for supporting our work, it makes a difference being able to work full speed

).
Please don't think that I do not appreciate everything you guys have done. I have been told that the developers are highly sensitive about it. Which I understand why and while I post about this uneasy subject I want to make sure that I state very clearly that I respect all of you and the work you have done. Without it I could not really do what I want to.
Please keep that in mind. please keep in mind that I am just searching for the right decision for what I need.