Thanks - I read through that, and understand the residual value calculation in normal circumstances - where we swap the value of an unexpired term into pay for a full term of a replacement plan.
However, in this case, Plan A has a different price for the first year than the price for the second year and thereafter.
Plan B also has a different price for the first year than the price for the second year and thereafter - and it has more features.
If I am halfway through the first year on plan A, which I paid 60 for I know that I am going to be charged a lower price in the second year if I renew, a price of 40.
But I haven't completed my first year of membership. If I want to upgrade to plan B for 70 the first year, and 50 per year after, there could be different ways that upgrade logic could work.
Logic #1: I get credit for 30 of my unexpired plan A first year with six months to go, and it is applied to a new full first year of plan B. So my one year count starts again, and I pay 40 for that full year at the upgraded level.
Logic #2: I get credit for 30 of my unexpired plan A first year with six months to go, and it is applied to six more months to finish off a full first year with Plan B. Plan B is prorated for the remaining first year at 35, my 30 is applied in residual value, and I pay 5. In six months, my price is reduced for subsequent years and I pay 50 per year thereafter with plan B.
Logic #3: I get credit for 30 of my unexpired plan A first year with six months to go, and it is applied to the renewal rate for Plan B, which is 50. I pay the 20 net to start a new one year cycle.
So in essence, my question gets down to how residual value is applied when you go from one split Plan to another.
Or, if you have a thought to structure it differently to anticipate this issue.