Replying to this thread isn't going to move your request, it simply means it takes away from development time. Albeit 5 minutes, 10 minutes, whatever the case; the point being the time can be directed more usefully.
As always we don't keep a constant timeline of what EXACTLY is going on. When it's noted it's noted and we'll get to it when we get to it. Our SVN is private for now, but we do have plans to open it up. You can see it in action with GroupJive, but even then users fail time and time to check the timeline, to add bug tickets, or feature requests, etc... So as far as the public test of the idea of an SVN, it's failing. If the community can't grasp its concept then it's 1 more step for us to have to manage with no means to its end.
I believe it could be speculated we're a massive corporate of 100 programmers, but that's just not the case. So it helps if the community can not expect features to be implemented yesterday. As simple as it may seam to add payment gateways it's not and adding payment gateways is far more important then this currently requested feature, which is high priority, but payment gateways are urgent.
Hopefully this can be understood and we can be more on a common ground. I did express this in my previous posts it was however, agreed, vaguely and for that I apologize. We've been hit with this question BEFORE your thread and clearly had been frustrated and it may or may not have been directed at you while obviously this is not just nor excusable we hope you too can understand our frustration and again apologize for this.
So the bottom line and straight forward answer is: We've not even started the new feature. Its request is in our SVN.
Post edited by: krileon, at: 2009/11/10 02:02