Coolness template

10 years 8 months ago - 10 years 8 months ago #230786 by cuertech
Coolness template was created by cuertech
Whilst updating from Coolness 1.6.1 to 2.0.1 templates on a copy test site I found that module positions-5 and position-6 would not display correctly (i.e. side by side) whereas modules position 3 and 4 worked perfectly as before.

Looking at the 2.0.1 main template file, it showed on lines 102 / 103

$topCount = $this->countModules('position-3') + $this->countModules('position-4');
$botCount = $this->countModules('position-2') + $this->countModules('position-5');

as ganged module positions.

Editing the lines to

$topCount = $this->countModules('position-3') + $this->countModules('position-4');
$botCount = $this->countModules('position-5') + $this->countModules('position-6');

solved the issue.

I submit this as assistance to others that may come across the problem, as I'd had noticed display issues with this template before in versions later than 1.6.1.

Cheers
AJB
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jacob

Please Log in to join the conversation.

10 years 8 months ago #230860 by Jacob
Replied by Jacob on topic Coolness template
Thank you for reporting this bug. We will update the code on our end.

Joomla Development and Support since 2005

Please Log in to join the conversation.

10 years 7 months ago #232326 by cuertech
Replied by cuertech on topic Coolness template
I note that the in the latest available Coolness 2.01 template (395) download that the errant code line referred to in earlier posts has not yet been modified in that latest available download.

I just installed the template on a test site and got the same results that triggered this thread :P

Please Log in to join the conversation.

10 years 7 months ago #232437 by Jacob
Replied by Jacob on topic Coolness template
We do have the fix on SVN, we'll update the template files on the site.

Joomla Development and Support since 2005

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Moderators: beatnantkrileon
Time to create page: 0.188 seconds

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn