Status of Bug #3038?

12 years 2 months ago #191360 by fribse2011
Replied by fribse2011 on topic Re: Status of Bug #3038?
Yes we agree completely, and I look forward to having ACL's implemented this way, but my point was that the groups above are children of a common group.
So
Parent
- Group 1
- - Group 1a
- Group 2

So members of Parent, can be managed by group 1a, as they are in the same branch.
Members of Group 2 are of course inherently members of Parent, but not in the CB way of checking access, so what I did was to expressly give users of Group 2 an additional membership of Parent, and thus, because of that membership, they are manageble by Group 1a.

This worked in CB 1.7 with the 3038 patches published originally, but has stopped working in CB 1.8 RC.

The question though is, how much effort should be used to solve this (again), and that depends on the timeline for getting ACL support in CB moderators :-)

Best regards
Fribse

Frømandsklubben Nikon, www.nikondyk.dk
We're a volunteer driven diving club in Ishøj, Denmark.
Har du brug for en dykkerklub der rummer alle, så kom ned til os.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

12 years 2 months ago - 12 years 2 months ago #191413 by krileon
Replied by krileon on topic Re: Status of Bug #3038?

So members of Parent, can be managed by group 1a, as they are in the same branch.

Right, that's correct.

Members of Group 2 are of course inherently members of Parent, but not in the CB way of checking access, so what I did was to expressly give users of Group 2 an additional membership of Parent, and thus, because of that membership, they are manageble by Group 1a.

Group 2 shouldn't be manageable by Group 1a as it's a different branch.

This worked in CB 1.7 with the 3038 patches published originally, but has stopped working in CB 1.8 RC.

The original patch was bugged and barely tested. It allowed for certain users to edit other users which never should've been the case. Base off your needs you should have the below setup.

Parent
- Group 1
- - Group 2
- - - Group 1a

The question though is, how much effort should be used to solve this (again), and that depends on the timeline for getting ACL support in CB moderators

It is fixed, what you had experienced was basically a bug of a bug fix. It's now functioning in the same regard Joomla would understand it to function. At any rate we're moving away from usergroups and understand it to be working properly now. CB 2.0 will eliminate pretty much all usergroup usage except for assigning those groups to users and setting the permissions for those groups.


Kyle (Krileon)
Community Builder Team Member
Before posting on forums: Read FAQ thoroughly + Read our Documentation + Search the forums
CB links: Documentation - Localization - CB Quickstart - CB Paid Subscriptions - Add-Ons - Forge
--
If you are a Professional, Developer, or CB Paid Subscriptions subscriber and have a support issue please always post in your respective support forums for best results!
--
If I've missed your support post with a delay of 3 days or greater and are a Professional, Developer, or CBSubs subscriber please send me a private message with your thread and will reply when possible!
--
Please note I am available Monday - Friday from 8:00 AM CST to 4:00 PM CST. I am away on weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and if I've missed your post on or before a weekend after business hours please wait for the next following business day (Monday) and will get to your issue as soon as possible, thank you.
--
My role here is to provide guidance and assistance. I cannot provide custom code for each custom requirement. Please do not inquire me about custom development.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Moderators: beatnantkrileon
Time to create page: 0.407 seconds