And if we followed your line of reasoning, we'd all still be banging the rocks together...

Of course there will be differences and improvements yet to be realised in this or any improved version, both in Joomla! and CB, but that is not a valid reason for letting everyone else deal with all the crap and only using a new version when the rough spots have been ironed out, in my opinion.

What do you think... that Joomla! 1.0 just spontaneuously happened without prior months of effort from users and testers on sites like this? How would it be if they just took your advice and stuck with the 0.9 beta?

If you had bothered to read the thread you would have seen quite clearly what the problem is. Not that I wanted to change the colour, but that it is the only login module I have found that doesn't change its colour when all others do.

And no, to be correct, he wasn't trying to help me. He was telling me he had not recieved the several emails and PMs I have sent him, which was of no help at all of course. The help would have come later, if at all.

There's no "kiddy fit" involved here, well not on my part anyway, simply that I just can't be bothered to wait until the project gets round to providing some simple assistance, which is what I thought I was entightled to when I paid to join. I'll just use one of the many login modules (which includes the Joomla! 1.5.7 module, by the way), which does work as it should, until they get round to acknowledging the problem with the CBLogin module and fix it.

Then, at that time, maybe I will think of re-installing CB or simply use something else. I'll see how far CB improves in the meantime.

RTB.

When you look at the rendered HTML (source) when not logged in, does the module class show the suffix?

Thank you for trying to help (rather than pretending to help and giving yourself all the excuses why not), but I have now uninstalled CB.

I may return to it at a later date but I have a suspicion I won't.

Again, many thanks for this real attempt at help.

RTB.

I'm the currious sort, so tested this myself.

By checking the rendered HTML, I can confirm that when the module displays while not logged it, it does not pass the module class suffix. When you are logged in, the module does pass the class suffix.